According to some comments from here, here and in some of the Emails I get people sometime experience asynchronous sound. As I have speculated here, this is most likely due the CPU being overwhelmed with the whole encoding process. Let me try to explain, and bear in mind, this is just speculation based on nothing but my own suspicions.
When you set the threads in the x264 codec to fully utilize your CPU, meaning all cores, and then some, you make sure the CPU is working at its maximum capacity just for video processing.
If you then add audio to the pile, the CPU just hasn’t got any resources to spare, and if it does, it does a miserable job, thus resulting in lag which translates in asynchronous sound.
If that is the case, lowering the numbers of threads in the x264 codec should fix it. This way you can have both audio and video encoding in one go. I haven’t tried this method, because I employ a different solution.
How I do it:
I process video and audio separately. First I encode/transcode the video, leaving the audio in its original form. Then I encode the audio and overwrite it.
Let say we have recorded a video and named this video myvideo_unedited.avi .
Transcode/Encode your myvideo_unedited.avi according to this or this BUT leave “Audio” at “Direct Stream copy”. DO NOT change it like suggested in the aforementioned links and name this new video for instance transcoded-myvideo_RAWAUDIO.avi.
Now open transcoded-myvideo_RAWAUDIO.avi and set your “Video” to “Direct Stream copy”. In “Audio” you set it to “Full Processing Mode”. Go on and set your “Compression”, “Volume”, and other settings to your liking and save this new sound via “File”->”Save WAV…”. The WAV-file is called the same as the video, in this case it’ll be transcoded-myvideo_RAWAUDIO.wav.
Now set your “Audio” to “Direct Stream copy”, and click “Audio from another file…” and select the new transcoded-myvideo_RAWAUDIO.wav and save this new video with its new audio via “File”->”Save as AVI…” and name it for example myvideo_final.avi.
You’re surely asking why I’m doing this stupid extra work, when I can just lower the threads and be possibly done with it. The answer is transcoding/encoding speed. Lowering the threads in the x264 codec translates into longer transcoding time. Processing video needs much, much more time, than processing sound does.
Say for example, if I were to encode a 15 min. video, and I’d lower the threads just so I can process sound and video in one go, the whole process might take me maybe 1 hour, 30 min. If I encode video first, and leave the sound alone, the process takes me about 1 hour to complete. Then I process the sound alone which takes about 10 seconds. After that I merge both and I’m done in 1 hour and 5 min. That’s 25 minutes shaved off.
Another important notice: Sometimes the sound is asynchronous when you play it in your vlc or any other player. However after you upload your video to YouTube the sound magically seems to be synchronous again. I haven’t got a clue why that is but it happens sometimes.
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Thank for very good work!